Experiment Z-16

uhohI missed this Adage article which explains how Zack16 is an ‘experiment’by P&G via Leo Burnett in Chicago. For many of the reasons mentioned in my prior post, I don’t think this experiment has been given much of a fighting chance.

Were it launched from the inside-out I think it might have had significant impact. It just goes to show you that in this media environment, anything less than a full court press probably isn’t enough. That was one thing Dove had going for it. Before the ‘Real Beauty’video, the campaign had been around for a couple years. It exists even today in multiple media. It has authentic aspirations to do more than sell soap. The YouTube video was just part of a comprehensive integrated approach that delivered a consistent idea with a long shelf life (unlike a lot of modern marketing efforts) that actually resonated with the inner feelings of millions of women. Pretty impressive for advertising. And soap.

Conversely, the Zack16 film was just uploaded onto the Internet in hopes that it would magically ‘go viral’. Generally speaking, I’m not sure how much ‘viral’can truly be engineered into anything, but there was certainly more that could’ve been done to help this program make a bigger splash.

According to the AdAge article, the standard campaign for Tampax is enjoying more YouTube viewing than Zack16.

In my mind, Zack16 could’ve been more than advertising for a lot of young people. There was the real possbility of dialogue there. It’s a taboo topic with a lot of emotions hitting kids at an age when talking about these things could make a difference (and earn some lifelong brand loyalty in the process). I think Zack16 could have really carved out a unique place for Tampax the way Dove’s Real Beauty made soap stand for something deeper than just clean skin.

Zack16

zackFrankly, I’m surprised I’ve not heard more about this both inside the ad industry and from the public in general. It’s very well done from the creative standpoint. There is a clever, entertaining premise underpinning it all and a soft enough sell to sneak under the radar. You get to enjoy about 11 minutes of compelling, funny, sensitive narrative before the product placement shows up and even then, it manages the rare feat of seeming unforced.

There’s also some real value here. For young girls, it seems to go a long way toward validating the emotions I am told surround this uncomfortable event. And for some boys it may provide a perspective they can understand which in turn might lead to a little empathy rather than the standard antagonism.

If this initiative works, it also would do so flying in the face of the conventional wisdom that Millennials don’t sit still long enough to absorb longer form content.

Like the Dove real-beauty campaign, my guess is any success here will stem from the sincerity and honesty of the message. There’s no hyperbole, no promises, and no exaggeration – right down to Zack’s blog actually providing useful resources for the target in context and wrapping it in entertaining, engaging writing.

It’s also nice to see inventive work for one of those ‘dull categories’that no one believes can lead to innovative, buzzworthy work. There seems to be an unspoken prerequisite that only interesting, sexy products or high shock-value stunts can conjure viral interest. Yet Dove soap did it by understanding the customer on a very deep level. This depth of insight also seems well articulated by Zack16.com.

If anyone knows some hard data on the success of this program I’d be interested in learning more.

Bottom Up & Inside Out

I’m a little late in getting around to this posting. Some time ago I participated in a panel at the Berkley Center for Entrepreneurial Studies at NYU. I was asked to discuss integrating online and offline media for the purposes of marketing.

This was my presentation: Selling In A Consumer-Empowered Marketplace

Preparing for this presentation I took the original marketing cycle I learned in college and updated it to reflect the impact of the Internet (which was originally to displace print as the primary information gathering medium). It looks like this:

Awareness Informed Awareness Conviction Trial Repeat

The problem of course is that the digital infrastructure that the Internet rests upon not only displaced print, but it also made it much easier to build customized media channels and experiences. This lead to the massive fragmentation that in turn made the mass media, TV-centric advertising business harder, more expensive and a lot less effective.

To compound these problems, the social web (Web 2.0) started wreaking havoc just as traditional agencies were wrapping their heads around using the Internet to support the ad-centric model. Terms like ‘banners’, ‘Google Ad Words’, ‘rich media advertising’, ‘pre-rolls’and ‘impressions’were just making their way to the top floors of ad agencies when the social web disrupted the whole process by displacing the value of all we were told to hold dear.

‘Buzz’, ‘viral’, ‘word-of-mouth’and ‘sticky’became the new terms. They have proven very disorienting because they don’t fit neatly into the advertising model. ‘Paid media value’is giving way to ‘earned media value‘.

Social media-enabled consumers are becoming the most powerful purchase-influencing channel available to marketers. Given this, I am recommending a new way of looking at approaching the marketing cycle:

evangelism, trial, conviction, information, awareness

The net take away is this: If you want to sell something today, think less about the features and benefits of a product, or the marketing messages being published, and more about what your customers will do once they get their hands on either. Command and control marketing (and it’s battlefield-centric lingo like ‘campaigns’, ‘targets’, and ‘media blitzes’) is being replaced by cooperative, communal terms like ‘community’‘network’‘friending’and ‘following’. This isn’t to say you have to ‘give up control of your brand’(that’s the hype pendulum swinging the other way) so much as needing to adopt a new, more flexible approach to ultimately getting what you want from your brand (which is revenue and long-term value creation).

Recalibrating to this environment has not been easy. But one thing is for sure – today it’s all about the customer.

Bottom-Up: Start with the customer.
If the customer is all-powerful, then an evangelical customer is a true asset. For sexy brands (like consumer electronics) stoking evangelism may come easier. But true believers come in all forms and brands were invented to capitalize on this by emdying the trust that leads to loyal purchase decisions.

(Incidentally, a fellow from Disney once mentioned that rather than doing one thing 100% better, they focus on doing one hundred things 1% better. Something to think about in mature or unsexy categories where headline-grabbing product innovation is harder to leverage in creating evangelists.)

Evangelism is all about believing. To make anyone believe they have to experience what you’re offering in a way that feels authentic to them. Consumer insights – real, actionable insights -  are critical to this process. I find it more than a little ironic that most of the talk around ‘social media’is focused on the technology and less on the sociology of how communities form. While people may initially gather around a technology (witness the Oprahfication of Twitter) enduring communities bond over common interests, lifestyles and beliefs. The glue of a community is not a button, badge, app or icon.

Finding out what makes people tick requires looking into much more than just how they feel about your product or category. More importantly, the courage to seek disconfirming insights is critical. In a search-centric world, it’s easy to find evidence to support what we already hold to be true. Thorough professionals will take the time to look for a contrarian opinion. The reward for this bravery is the potential for a spark of innovation that competitor’s hadn’t considered.

Despite a fragmented media environment, people lead integrated lives in which their various media choices – and your product – are but a small part of an ongoing, interwoven existence. Understanding the full panorama of these lives mitigates against the naturally-occuring myopia common to companies focused on the business they’re engaged in. Step back, look at your customers broad and deep, and let this perspective inform the work you’re focused on doing.

Inside Out: Integration Means More Than Media
Once the customer is understood it’s time to think about that customer’s experience. Evangelism after all is predicated on more than a satisfying experience, it requires a remarkable, bloggable, postable, tell-a-friendable one.

To pull this off requires absolute alignment within an organization. The vision and mission of the executive team must be realized in the way managers build processes and employees execute them. And all of this must remain in synchrony with the greater understanding of the customers being served. If digitally-enabled word of mouth is the most powerful purchase-driving medium out there, then suddenly the call center rep handling a cranky customer can have a significant impact on your business.

The cost in time, money and resources to get a single new customer to pick up the phone, order or try your product is very, very high. The payoff comes when that customer’s experience of the product’s quality, and the company’s people and processes is so remarkable that they want to tell their extended digital network all about it.

Endangered Awareness
On the plus side, working from the bottom-up and inside-out need not bleed a company’s marketing budget early on. Much of this work is on the less expensive side (at least in comparison to running a national television campaign). In fact, a big reason to work from the inside-out is that when it comes to spending the big bucks on paid media, having all that other work in order increases the return of every precious ad dollar spent.

This brings us to the final step in the new marketing process – building awareness. Building awareness will only get harder. The digital media used by consumers became powerful because it is user-controlled. A negative byproduct of this (from an advertiser’s perspective) is that consumers can search for what they know interests them and effectively block everything else out. There’s enough information and choice available on any topic or interest to keep us all busy for our entire lives. This makes serendipity (discovering something you didn’t know you liked) an increasingly uncommon occurance.

Sort of.

Yes, its true, we can all spend our days searching for information that interests us. But in the process of building digital networks we link ourselves to other people who have some common interests and some different ones. This is, in my mind, the future of serendipity. I can discover interesting new ideas easier by interacting with friends online. Serendipity happens spontaneously and naturally in my social interactions. Links are passed by a reliable source and therefore worth investigating.

While TV campaigns will continue to ripple across our consciousness and traditional advertising will always have its place, the slice of our consciousness it influences will be reduced and frankly isn’t coming back.

To that end, even building Awareness at the far end of the spectrum comes down to recognizing the customer as primary messenger. Determine what you want your customer to say about you (the evangelist’s message) by determining what about your product/service/brand will resonate with your customer (the actionable insights into their integrated lives).

This won’t solve every marketing problem you face, but it will give you a star to navigate by.

Only The News That’s Fit to Publish

It only takes a brief perusal of the assorted headlines, blog postings and tweets, to see just how much the news industry is struggling with disruptive technologies today.

In pondering all this, I am struck by the relationship between the inherent intervals of various technologies and the ‘newsiness’of the news. ‘Bringing you breaking news’has been a long-time value proposition of the news industry but I’m not so sure it can survive.

By way of example, my Twitter feed is truly real-time news. It updates by the second. So fast in fact that I can’t keep up. In many ways its my personally-defined CNN news ticker (even if many of the headlines are obtuse and the TInyURL links blind).

Facebook (as a stand-in for traditional social networks) seems to run at an update interval of ‘a few times a day’. It’s news is hyper-local to me – not geographically but socially. And let’s face it, in this day and age, geography matters less and less in terms of the people we feel connected to.

Blogging seems to walk the line between ‘a few times a day’to ‘once daily’. The content tends to be longer and better reasoned. Blog topics can also be rather granular so I get a very concrentrated dose of a topic I am interested in.  In short, blog posts have a greater opportunity to be of higher quality than a tweet or even a Facebook update. I may not know the bloggers I follow (so they’re not as ‘local’) but I have chosen them because I like the way they think and write about the topics I am interested in. Often they also feel more ‘authentic’because I assume (often incorrectly) that they are pro-am writers and not salaried corporate suits.

So in comparison to traditional news sources, Twitter is faster, Facebook is more ‘local’and blogs have a higher perceived authenticity alongside longer, meatier content.

So what’s left for the commercial news industry to sell that these other guys don’t seem to be better at?

Here I’d point to the YouTube v. Hulu slugfest. While YouTube got a lot of hype (and market valuation) Hulu has actually made money, attracted advertising revenue and demonstrated a longer-term value proposition by focusing on professional calibre content.

Where YouTube saw the Internet as a social technology with media distribution capabilities, Hulu seems to see the Internet as a distribution system with social capabilities. This isn’t symantics, it’s carving out a competitive advantage.

What would happen if the news industry focused less on ‘breaking news’and more on ‘quality news narratives’? What if the news industry gave up reliance on the audience for fast, endless soundbytes and headlines and focused on reasoned discussion, in-depth analysis and professionally-assembled details. These are all things professional news companies should be able to do better than the UGC set.

If you think about it, a lot of what defines today’s professional news leaders are the people offering the editorial. Think Fox news. Think the op-ed section of the Times. While neither Fox nor the Times can be as fast as twitter or as local as Facebook or as authentic and granularly focused on single topics as the pro-am bloggers I like, it can deliver a production quality and talent base these other media can’t. Plus they’ve got the credentials to get into the right rooms with the right people to tell many types of stories – political, business, celebrity – first-hand.

When Gutenberg invented movable type it enabled anyone to produce text. That didn’t mean everyone’s text was worth reading, only that it could be made and distributed. Music production software has done the same for music. So have Podcasting, camcorders, blogging software, Twitter, etc.

All of these technologies enable anyone to publish. What they don’t do is assure quality. Quite the contrary, they bury us all in a lot of crappy content. For every piece that goes viral, most go nowhere. And a lot of the ‘viral’stuff is a blip on our radar that vanishes as quickly as it appears offering 15 minutes of fame and then a return to unpaid obscurity.

A professional news provider could still build its reputation on having the best imagery, the best produced video, the most reasoned, well-researched and articulated stories all presented by charismatic talent that resonates with an audience. This news provider would not replace my Twitter stream or my Facebook friends or my blog surfing, but it would be something that, when I got tired of the banality of everyday content, would be stimulating and remarkable.

Social media is a great equalizer – for good and bad. It is highly disruptive and the reality is, the available marketshare for professional news may shrink overall (just like most markets as they mature and consolidate). Some outfits will simply lose and disappear. Others will have to rethink their infrastructure from the ground up if they’re to keep the lights on and their employees paid. But among the millions churning out user generated content something professionally made and remarkable will always find an audience.

Despite our culture’s infatuation with all things user-generated, quality content will always provide value to a well-defined audience whose needs are being met. The trick then is to build a business that can efficiently create that quality content by leveraging all the tools available. Doing this may be ugly work, but such is the nature of adaption.

‘All the news that’s fit to print’might still be a useful governing principle. The focus must change from ‘all’(volume and speed) to ‘fit’(quality and value) and not necessarily assume ‘print’.