<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Not-So-New Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyncerely.com/2009/07/15/the-not-so-new-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyncerely.com/2009/07/15/the-not-so-new-media/</link>
	<description>Personal musings on professional matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word of Finger: Persuasion &#38; the Science of Marketing. &#171; Cyncerely</title>
		<link>http://cyncerely.com/2009/07/15/the-not-so-new-media/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Word of Finger: Persuasion &#38; the Science of Marketing. &#171; Cyncerely]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyncerely.com/?p=485#comment-630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I also believe that the discourse around social media has largely been focused on how it displaces traditional media. This has had the effect of funneling the thinking around social media into comparative dynamic which tends to force old categories to the surface. I would even go so far as to say the applications of social media have been largely focused on satisfying the same needs as traditional media &#8211; awareness, recall, exposure, impressions. This latter is probably the industry&#8217;s way of adhering to the principle of apperception. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I also believe that the discourse around social media has largely been focused on how it displaces traditional media. This has had the effect of funneling the thinking around social media into comparative dynamic which tends to force old categories to the surface. I would even go so far as to say the applications of social media have been largely focused on satisfying the same needs as traditional media &#8211; awareness, recall, exposure, impressions. This latter is probably the industry&#8217;s way of adhering to the principle of apperception. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Few people buy something &#8216;like you&#8217;ve never seen before&#8217;. &#171; Cyncerely</title>
		<link>http://cyncerely.com/2009/07/15/the-not-so-new-media/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Few people buy something &#8216;like you&#8217;ve never seen before&#8217;. &#171; Cyncerely]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyncerely.com/?p=485#comment-271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] article in the New York Times does a nice job pointing out something I have mentioned in this posting and more recently in this one.  This has everything to do with Now Not [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article in the New York Times does a nice job pointing out something I have mentioned in this posting and more recently in this one.  This has everything to do with Now Not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

